proposal: multiple psql option -c

From: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, dinesh kumar <dineshkumar02(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: proposal: multiple psql option -c
Date: 2015-07-25 08:33:14
Message-ID: CAKFQuwbVp-4dEf=YFw2hwjyegt84i36Vj0rAvmjyutZB8xCFGQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Saturday, July 25, 2015, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> 2015-07-23 17:52 GMT+02:00 Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>:
>
>> On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 12:36 AM, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
>> wrote:
>> >> Or just properly understand the ; ?
>> >>
>> >> -c "select * from foo; update bar set baz = 'bing'; vacuum bar;"
>> >
>> > there is a risk of compatibility issues - all statements runs under one
>> > transaction implicitly
>>
>> So what?
>>
>
> [pavel(at)dhcppc2 ~]$ psql -c "insert into x
> values(txid_current()::text);insert into x values(txid_current()::text)"
> postgres
> INSERT 0 1
> the state string "INSERT 0 1" is buggy probably
>

How do you figure? The last statement only inserted one record.

To that point would you expect each separate -c to output its results to
the console?

David J.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2015-07-25 08:39:04 Re: Proposal for CSN based snapshots
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2015-07-25 08:12:54 Re: proposal: multiple psql option -c