| From: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Chapman Flack <chap(at)anastigmatix(dot)net>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: proposal: variadic argument support for least, greatest function |
| Date: | 2019-03-11 22:26:03 |
| Message-ID: | CAKFQuwbO+U20_-wb2uwd-88exKSKDrgV-mSVoFZNpZR+ZUptDA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 3:07 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> > I'm going to mark this as rejected. Here's a possible doc patch
>
> Maybe s/strictly/ordinary/, or some other word? "strictly"
> doesn't convey much to me. Otherwise seems fine.
>
How about:
While the COALESCE, GREATEST, and LEAST functions below accept a
variable number of arguments they do not support the passing of a
VARIADIC array.
?
David J.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Euler Taveira | 2019-03-11 23:53:28 | Re: Suggestions on message transfer among backends |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2019-03-11 22:25:40 | Re: proposal: variadic argument support for least, greatest function |