Re: proposal: variadic argument support for least, greatest function

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Chapman Flack <chap(at)anastigmatix(dot)net>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: proposal: variadic argument support for least, greatest function
Date: 2019-03-11 22:25:40
Message-ID: 62e28d69-bb52-5ae6-508d-a64ab1ea78ba@2ndQuadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On 3/11/19 6:07 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
>> I'm going to mark this as rejected. Here's a possible doc patch
> Maybe s/strictly/ordinary/, or some other word? "strictly"
> doesn't convey much to me. Otherwise seems fine.

OK, done.

cheers

andrew

--
Andrew Dunstan https://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David G. Johnston 2019-03-11 22:26:03 Re: proposal: variadic argument support for least, greatest function
Previous Message Tom Lane 2019-03-11 22:07:01 Re: proposal: variadic argument support for least, greatest function