| From: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Fast default stuff versus pg_upgrade |
| Date: | 2018-06-19 17:41:00 |
| Message-ID: | CAKFQuwbHZMfw308Wq+B_dKjfKCqOvjuK-H6G+tiTpwE8pCb-0Q@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 9:37 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> The problem here is that that function does not exist in 11beta1.
> Since adding the "incoming" function is certainly going to require
> initdb, we have to be able to dump from the server as it now stands,
> or we'll be cutting existing beta testers adrift.
>
I was under the impression that we don't promise to support a "v10 -> beta
-> rc -> final" upgrade path; instead, once final is released people would
be expected to upgrade "v10 -> v11". Under that condition requiring users
to do "v10 -> beta2" instead of "beta1 -> beta2", while annoying, is well
within the realm of possibility and expectation.
David J.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jeevan Ladhe | 2018-06-19 17:41:10 | Re: ToDo: show size of partitioned table |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2018-06-19 17:39:49 | Re: Fast default stuff versus pg_upgrade |