| From: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Chao Li <li(dot)evan(dot)chao(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Question about criteria for adding items to the v19 open items wiki page |
| Date: | 2026-04-23 04:57:19 |
| Message-ID: | CAKFQuwbE7_CC6=R86ogavnv2r9b+nf1-SXu3u2mnuREkQwCwDQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wednesday, April 22, 2026, Chao Li <li(dot)evan(dot)chao(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>
> Please forgive this probably naive question, as this is the first release
> cycle I’ve experienced.
>
> I’ve seen people mention putting something on the v19 open items wiki page
> many times, but I’m not sure what kinds of things are supposed to go there.
> What should be added there, and are there any criteria for deciding that?
>
Any bugs discovered in newly developed features in v19. As a practical
matter, ones that seem complicated to resolve make it there since quickly
resolved ones just get fixed.
Bugs that reproduce in v18 or earlier would not be placed there.
It’s a chance to demonstrate personal judgement. Severity and
committer/author responsiveness are two additional criteria to judge. It’s
both a simple tracker but also a kind of escalation channel since it gets
RMT members involved.
David J.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Rowley | 2026-04-23 05:19:22 | Re: Cleanup shadows variable warnings, round 1 |
| Previous Message | Fujii Masao | 2026-04-23 04:51:53 | Re: Exit walsender before confirming remote flush in logical replication |