Re: Error-safe user functions

From: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Nikita Glukhov <n(dot)gluhov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Error-safe user functions
Date: 2022-12-07 17:02:47
Message-ID: CAKFQuwb8G1NYsTnWxQmsy0FJiXoi+k41YeNEfCL9o3DH30MSBA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Dec 7, 2022 at 9:59 AM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

> "David G. Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>
> > Are you suggesting we should not go down the path that v8-0003 does in
> the
> > monitoring section cleanup thread? I find the usability of Chapter 54
> > System Views to be superior to these two run-on chapters and would rather
> > we emulate it in both these places - for what is in the end very little
> > additional effort, all mechanical in nature.
>
> I have not been following that thread, and am not really excited about
> putting in a huge amount of documentation work here. I'd just like 9.26
> to have a mini-TOC at the page head, which <sect2>'s would be enough for.
>
>
So long as you aren't opposed to the idea if someone else does the work,
adding sect2 is better than nothing even if it is just a stop-gap measure.

David J.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2022-12-07 17:08:48 Re: [PATCH] pg_dump: lock tables in batches
Previous Message Corey Huinker 2022-12-07 17:01:11 Re: Error-safe user functions