| From: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | John Scalia <jayknowsunix(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Albe Laurenz <laurenz(dot)albe(at)wien(dot)gv(dot)at>, "pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: string not equal query, postgresql 9.4.4 |
| Date: | 2015-09-17 23:49:25 |
| Message-ID: | CAKFQuwawTZkzW75hfU_shS-_uEW7AGw83b_G0ZuWNc6+TFLcXw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin |
On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 6:18 PM, John Scalia <jayknowsunix(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> SELECT * FROM results where result <> 'PASS';
>
> and it produced all the rows, not just the ones beginning with visc60 that
> I expected. Based on what you had written, I should have seen the correct
> output. So, any ideas?
>
EXPLAIN ANALYZE SELECT * FROM results WHERE result <> 'PASS';
What happens when you run the following? Do you see the same incorrect
behavior?
WITH vals (v) AS (
VALUES ('PASS'::char(4)), ('FAIL'::char(4))
)
SELECT
DISTINCT
*
FROM vals
WHERE v <> 'PASS'::char(4);
David J.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | John Scalia | 2015-09-18 00:52:57 | Re: string not equal query, postgresql 9.4.4 |
| Previous Message | John Scalia | 2015-09-17 22:18:42 | Re: string not equal query, postgresql 9.4.4 |