From: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | doc: Make logical replication examples executable in bulk and legal sgml. |
Date: | 2025-05-23 05:22:51 |
Message-ID: | CAKFQuwaoVnG=tf_pykt73Z1+t6CL=x51_ZNS43DSYsPFt26WGw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thursday, May 22, 2025, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Sat, May 3, 2025 at 9:33 PM David G. Johnston
> <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > While responding to a "our documentation is buggy" complaint I got
> annoyed in my attempt to reproduce the behavior by having to surgically
> copy line-by-line the DDL and DML code involved. Let's strive for a more
> copy-paste friendly example setup. No prompts and no interspersed command
> tags (they are ok if the script is one block and the output is another).
> >
>
> That's a valid point. Since this is not a correctness issue, I am less
> inclined to backpatch. What do you or others think?
>
Agreed, this would not be back-patched.
David J.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2025-05-23 06:16:51 | Re: PG 18 release notes draft committed |
Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2025-05-23 05:19:05 | Re: doc: Make logical replication examples executable in bulk and legal sgml. |