doc: Make logical replication examples executable in bulk and legal sgml.

From: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: doc: Make logical replication examples executable in bulk and legal sgml.
Date: 2025-05-23 05:22:51
Message-ID: CAKFQuwaoVnG=tf_pykt73Z1+t6CL=x51_ZNS43DSYsPFt26WGw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thursday, May 22, 2025, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> On Sat, May 3, 2025 at 9:33 PM David G. Johnston
> <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > While responding to a "our documentation is buggy" complaint I got
> annoyed in my attempt to reproduce the behavior by having to surgically
> copy line-by-line the DDL and DML code involved. Let's strive for a more
> copy-paste friendly example setup. No prompts and no interspersed command
> tags (they are ok if the script is one block and the output is another).
> >
>
> That's a valid point. Since this is not a correctness issue, I am less
> inclined to backpatch. What do you or others think?
>

Agreed, this would not be back-patched.

David J.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2025-05-23 06:16:51 Re: PG 18 release notes draft committed
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2025-05-23 05:19:05 Re: doc: Make logical replication examples executable in bulk and legal sgml.