Re: jsonb problematic operators

From: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Jordan Gigov <coladict(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: jsonb problematic operators
Date: 2016-12-09 17:40:12
Message-ID: CAKFQuwaPLsp6=Y7Q1JFPF=FqF1tXO6KRNrrRzLb-3rLyuAiE5A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 10:17 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

>
> As Geoff says, you don't have to use the operators; you could use the
> equivalent functions instead. Every operator just gets turned into a
> function call internally, so this is always possible.
>

In most cases - the decision to tie indexing to operators makes this
imperfect. Whether there is an actual problem with these operators I am
unsure.

David J.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2016-12-09 17:54:04 Re: jsonb problematic operators
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2016-12-09 17:39:50 proposal: psql statements \gstore \gstore_binary (instead COPY RAW)