| From: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> |
| Cc: | "matematica(dot)a3k(at)gmail(dot)com" <matematica(dot)a3k(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [Minor] Duplicated word in "Creating a Database" tutorial |
| Date: | 2026-09-25 14:05:11 |
| Message-ID: | CAKFQuwaOrdS2qM4PvZbMZ3XA=6O0HFeUDQYutg9Oz=LO6AHeGg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs |
On Friday, September 25, 2026, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> wrote:
> > On 24 Sep 2026, at 21:58, PG Doc comments form <noreply(at)postgresql(dot)org>
> wrote:
>
> > "that" is duplicated and should be removed.
>
> It seems like a correct sentence to me, removing as per your suggestion
> would
> AFAICT make it grammatically incorrect.
>
Probably, but wouldn’t saying “this user” instead of “that user” be equally
correct without making the word “that” serve two roles in the paragraph and
produce this annoying double-that construction?
David J.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2026-09-25 14:47:38 | Re: [Minor] Duplicated word in "Creating a Database" tutorial |
| Previous Message | PG Doc comments form | 2026-09-25 09:32:36 | log_line_prefix and JSON log format |