| From: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Treat <rob(at)xzilla(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, Chao Li <li(dot)evan(dot)chao(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Add missing period to HINT messages |
| Date: | 2026-04-14 01:00:16 |
| Message-ID: | CAKFQuwaLqZGubKbb0z-_-fE3UEd3T+ScF8DBJDwnfTaUkDNmDA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Monday, April 13, 2026, Robert Treat <rob(at)xzilla(dot)net> wrote:
>
>
> I don't have a strong opinion on it, but I think generally that clean
> up patches (where we aren't fixing some kind of document mistake or
> misleading information) generally just go into HEAD for the next
> release, though if it easily applies cleanly to back branches and you
> want to do it, it's probably ok to apply it backwards, but I wouldn't
> spend any time on it if it didn't.
>
I was under the impression that on both user-facing behavior changes
grounds, and translation grounds, back-patching changes to existing
messages is not allowed absent a true factual bug.
David J.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2026-04-14 01:07:25 | Re: Add missing period to HINT messages |
| Previous Message | Thomas Munro | 2026-04-14 00:57:27 | Re: Heads Up: cirrus-ci is shutting down June 1st |