From: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "sundar(at)mudupalli(dot)com" <sundar(at)mudupalli(dot)com>, "pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | BUG #18962: Type Conversion incorrect when performing UNION of queries. |
Date: | 2025-06-19 15:46:52 |
Message-ID: | CAKFQuwaGuUtTBOd4BiGYmuj+sq8d7T4_SVoKhDbpBCV7ubNJTg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
On Thursday, June 19, 2025, PG Bug reporting form <noreply(at)postgresql(dot)org>
wrote:
> The following bug has been logged on the website:
>
> Bug reference: 18962
> Logged by: Sundar Mudupalli
> Email address: sundar(at)mudupalli(dot)com
> PostgreSQL version: 17.5
> Operating system: Ubuntu I believe (using a Cloud SQL instance in GC
> Description:
>
> Take the following table definitions:
> ```
> create table public.test_table_1 as
> SELECT
> 'AA'::character(2) AS text_type
> UNION ALL
> SELECT
> 'BB'::character(2) AS text_type
> UNION ALL
> SELECT
> 'CC'::TEXT AS text_type
> ;
> create table public.test_table_2 (
> char_fixed character,
> char_fixed_len character(5),
> char_var character varying(5),
> text_column text );
> ```
> Based on the [type conversion rules for
> Union](https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/typeconv-union-case.html),
> the column `text_type` in `test_table_1` should resolve to the postgres
> data
> type `TEXT`.
We typically choose to suggest just avoiding “character” instead of trying
to document why the observed behavior is correct…
In short, "character no length restriction" is actually the documented type
"bpchar".
"character length restricted" is effectively a domain over "bpchar" - rule 2
"text" implicitly converts to "bpchar" - rule 5 vice-versa exception
Thus the final result is "bpchar".
David J.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Junwang Zhao | 2025-06-19 15:53:20 | Re: BUG #18959: Name collisions of expression indexes during parallel Index creations on a pratitioned table. |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2025-06-19 15:44:03 | Re: BUG #18962: Type Conversion incorrect when performing UNION of queries. |