Re: shared-memory based stats collector - v70

From: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: shared-memory based stats collector - v70
Date: 2022-04-06 03:18:38
Message-ID: CAKFQuwaGP5D2TFXn6x=KPjR3d7nN46gqcAWB=hrhOg4qo2E72w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Apr 5, 2022 at 8:11 PM Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu> wrote:

> I've never tried to review a 24-patch series before. It's kind of
> intimidating.... Is there a good place to start to get a good idea of
> the most important changes?
>

It isn't as bad as the number makes it sound - I just used "git am" to
apply the patches to a branch and skimmed each commit separately. Most of
them are tests or other minor pieces. The remaining few cover different
aspects of the major commit and you can choose them based upon your
experience and time.

David J.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Noah Misch 2022-04-06 03:21:00 Re: Skipping logical replication transactions on subscriber side
Previous Message Andres Freund 2022-04-06 03:14:16 Re: shared-memory based stats collector - v69