Re: Allow round() function to accept float and double precision

From: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, Sayyid Ali Sajjad Rizavi <sasrizavi(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Allow round() function to accept float and double precision
Date: 2022-12-01 19:30:56
Message-ID: CAKFQuwa50MfAjFzkbQCObHGDWMpu_zjoL2BQWETROZ_YP7eoOw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Dec 1, 2022 at 7:39 AM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

> Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>
> > The fact that passing a negative scale to round() isn't documented
> > does seem like an oversight though...
>
> Agreed, will do something about that.
>
>
Thanks. I'm a bit surprised you left "Rounds v to s decimal places." alone
though. I feel like the prose should also make clear that positions to the
left of the decimal, which are not conventionally considered decimal
places, can be identified.

Rounds v at s digits before or after the decimal place.

The examples will hopefully clear up any off-by-one concerns that someone
may have.

David J.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2022-12-01 19:41:11 Re: Error-safe user functions
Previous Message Andres Freund 2022-12-01 19:17:53 Re: Temporary tables versus wraparound... again