Re: Doc about how to set max_wal_senders when setting minimal wal_level

From: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Japin Li <japinli(at)hotmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Doc about how to set max_wal_senders when setting minimal wal_level
Date: 2022-07-19 03:22:44
Message-ID: CAKFQuwa3XiFbeYOVb92vU+BCHXULsEWn03WnRR-qbHtuXXY5rg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 8:16 PM Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:

> On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 07:39:55PM -0700, David G. Johnston wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 6:27 PM Japin Li <japinli(at)hotmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > +0.90
> >
> > Consider changing:
> >
> > "makes any base backups taken before this unusable"
> >
> > to:
> >
> > "makes existing base backups unusable"
> >
> > As I try to justify this, though, it isn't quite true, maybe:
> >
> > "makes point-in-time recovery, using existing base backups, unable to
> replay
> > future WAL."
>
> I went with simpler wording.
>
>
+1

Thanks!

David J.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2022-07-19 03:26:58 Re: pgsql: Default to hidden visibility for extension libraries where possi
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2022-07-19 03:16:15 Re: Doc about how to set max_wal_senders when setting minimal wal_level