From: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(dot)riggs(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Default to TIMESTAMP WITH TIME ZONE? |
Date: | 2021-08-13 18:47:45 |
Message-ID: | CAKFQuwa2--Ssqx0yhjOztX3F4yUOVHPtL54m1aYthGzJJopsWQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Friday, August 13, 2021, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> The one thing I could potentially see us doing is more strongly
> encouraging the use of the names "timestamp" and "timestamptz",
> up to and including changing what format_type() et al. put out.
+1. Having the canonical form be timestamptz would make pretending the
“with time zone” version doesn’t exist much easier.
David J.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Álvaro Herrera | 2021-08-13 18:50:16 | Re: Autovacuum on partitioned table (autoanalyze) |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2021-08-13 18:09:04 | Re: [PATCH] Native spinlock support on RISC-V |