Re: pgping?

From: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Gunnar <tongji(at)netcologne(dot)de>
Cc: "pgsql-admin(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-admin(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pgping?
Date: 2025-12-14 13:00:54
Message-ID: CAKFQuwZzrU-_zqNS5hvB+enfv6vLdRMz0n=_a3NNQ4uEAUDZWg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

On Saturday, December 13, 2025, Gunnar <tongji(at)netcologne(dot)de> wrote:
>
> as the aspiration, or maybe even commitment to that feature.
>
>
The amount of additional effort here, to meet such a theoretical
commitment, is so small that this interpretation seems extremely unlikely.
It was a deliberate choice that “is cluster running” not require any
particular element in that cluster to exist.

David J.

In response to

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message kasem adel 2025-12-14 15:30:03 Wal file increase
Previous Message David G. Johnston 2025-12-14 12:54:12 Re: pgping?