| From: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: NOTIFY docs fixup - emit and deliver consistency |
| Date: | 2020-10-01 23:39:00 |
| Message-ID: | CAKFQuwZx0eYNO-rzy4_YXpkcsm02sqtN_sGvWqyASaUFYhecMg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 8:38 PM David G. Johnston <
david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 7:58 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
>> Maybe we could use terminology along the lines of "added to the
>> queue" and "removed from the queue"?
>>
>
> Quickly looking it over with this in mind there are a few spots that can
> be cleaned up and linked together by explicitly talking about a FIFO queue
> as the mechanism instead of the less precise send/process/deliver. A bit
> more invasive but I think it will be done more clearly with this approach.
>
As attached.
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| v2-doc-notify-queue-focus.patch | application/octet-stream | 8.3 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Etsuro Fujita | 2020-10-02 00:00:53 | Re: Asynchronous Append on postgres_fdw nodes. |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2020-10-01 23:36:57 | Re: Rejecting redundant options in Create Collation |