| From: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Hayk Manukyan <manukyantt(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: BUG #17246: Feature request for adoptive indexes |
| Date: | 2021-10-26 19:37:49 |
| Message-ID: | CAKFQuwZwACC6O1CvQhaaQLuyfGDSPS+6+suLRqjmmT14Ky+6pg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
The convention here is to inline post.
On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 7:31 AM Hayk Manukyan <manukyantt(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Oh sorry,
> OK, I cant find the report
>
Can you close it for me please ?
>
This is just a mailing list. There is no formal project managed tracker
backing it. There is nothing to close.
> пн, 25 окт. 2021 г. в 17:57, Bharath Rupireddy <
> bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>:
>
>> Thanks. What you are proposing looks like a new feature request, it is
>> relevant to discuss in pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org [1]
>>
>
Actually, my impression was that actual features being implemented with
code belong on -hackers. Feature requests without code should be directed
to -general in order to give the broader community a chance to comment.
That kind of feedback is the way hackers know that something is worthwhile
to pursue.
David J.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2021-10-26 19:41:58 | Re: conchuela timeouts since 2021-10-09 system upgrade |
| Previous Message | Pavel Borisov | 2021-10-26 19:15:04 | Re: BUG #17246: Feature request for adoptive indexes |