Re: CALL optional in PL/pgSQL

From: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: CALL optional in PL/pgSQL
Date: 2018-03-01 05:23:26
Message-ID: CAKFQuwZtXekND2r7iZDDKWEGF7csJUPyjaYS57tAqeVk4S3qaA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wednesday, February 28, 2018, Peter Eisentraut <
peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>
>
> I seem to recall that there were past discussions about this, with
> respect to the PERFORM command, but I couldn't find them anymore.
>

I'm thinking you are thinking of this one.

https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAFjFpReVcC%2BRE3WBJb2X1-O%3D_%2BORiZggDZ-Orr0QafeuAC7k-w%40mail.gmail.com

David J.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrey Borodin 2018-03-01 05:23:41 Re: Online enabling of checksums
Previous Message Arseny Sher 2018-03-01 05:17:33 Why chain of snapshots is used in ReorderBufferCommit?