| From: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Chao Li <li(dot)evan(dot)chao(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: docs: clarify ALTER TABLE behavior on partitioned tables |
| Date: | 2026-01-21 03:08:36 |
| Message-ID: | CAKFQuwZr_GLBOOLohfEcKVVTcP9D+nzVdUUKabYbXWXRnOFjnA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tuesday, January 20, 2026, Chao Li <li(dot)evan(dot)chao(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>
> > On Jan 21, 2026, at 09:09, David G. Johnston <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 19, 2026 at 1:20 AM Chao Li <li(dot)evan(dot)chao(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > Thanks again for your review. I have integrated all your edits to v4.
> Once you consider the changes are okay, can you please mark the CF entry
> [1] as Ready for Committer?
> >
> >
> > v5 Attached with a delta.
> >
> > There exists described behaviors in the notes that are being removed
> that need to be retained; pertaining to inheritance setups. I put a note
> in place of the removals pointing out that when inheritance is being used
> for partitioning the rules for partitioned tables apply (implied 'unless
> otherwise noted') and that local/independent objects can always be
> addressed normally. I then incorporated the notes into the appropriate
> sub-command sections. Please give it a sanity check since I'm still
> getting my head around all this.
> >
> > David J.
> >
> > <v5-0001-docs-clarify-ALTER-TABLE-behavior-on-partitioned-
> .patch><v5-0002-delta.patch>
>
> Hi David,
>
> Thanks for your continuous review. I just checked the delta:
>
The tweaks all look good.
David J.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Henson Choi | 2026-01-21 03:27:15 | Re: Row pattern recognition |
| Previous Message | Peter Smith | 2026-01-21 02:58:08 | Re: Fix how some lists are displayed by psql \d+ |