| From: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Yousef Mohamed <yousssef(dot)mohammmed(dot)12(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: issue in the doc |
| Date: | 2026-04-05 23:00:03 |
| Message-ID: | CAKFQuwZne4AfBc379r+FNq1gJ0SMmNKZzcvJ6pFZso5-OfbP4w@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs |
On Sunday, April 5, 2026, Yousef Mohamed <yousssef(dot)mohammmed(dot)12(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:
>
> Question:
>
> In the expression:
> to_tsvector(x) @@ plainto_tsquery(y)
>
> what do x and y refer to exactly?
>
Local variables for the single expression being described. x is a text
typed value capable of being parsed as a vector, y is a text typed value
capable of being parsed as a query. (Or unknown, which then defaults to
text.).
>
> are they correspond to the left-hand and right-hand sides of the original
> expression (text @@ text) ?
>
In that x comes before y in the English alphabet just like in that
left-to-right language left comes physically before right, yes.
(text @@ text) isn’t an expression, it’s one’s way of writing the name of a
type.
if yes , i think it's better to mention the order of the x and y like :
> (x @@ y ) or ( y @@ x)
>
I’m not following how you think this could be improved. I get it’s very
western-centric, and admit it took me a moment to understand, but once I
did it seems quite clear to me. A concrete change to consider would be
helpful if this still doesn’t make sense. I have a few thoughts of my own,
chief among them being using real examples, but it doesn’t really my
threshold to work on at this time.
David J.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Fujii Masao | 2026-04-06 04:51:29 | Re: doc: Clarify ANALYZE VERBOSE output |
| Previous Message | Yousef Mohamed | 2026-04-05 22:38:17 | issue in the doc |