Re: having temp_tablespaces on less reliable storage

From: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Dimitrios Apostolou <jimis(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: having temp_tablespaces on less reliable storage
Date: 2025-07-10 18:04:35
Message-ID: CAKFQuwZmXzFN+DzN7nAyG8-+nu_LdC9wsLc6a2+cr4m4T-FAkQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Thu, Jul 10, 2025 at 10:58 AM Dimitrios Apostolou <jimis(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:

> Can't find any related documentation, but I expect loss of "temp" space is
> of minor importance.
>

You might want to try finding some old discussions about why putting temp
tablespace on a RAM-drive is not a supported configuration.

David J.

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Merlin Moncure 2025-07-10 19:02:59 Re: Aggregate versions of hashing functions (md5, sha1, etc...)
Previous Message Dimitrios Apostolou 2025-07-10 17:58:03 having temp_tablespaces on less reliable storage