From: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Igor Korot <ikorot01(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | "pgsql-generallists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Another documentation issue |
Date: | 2025-04-23 13:48:03 |
Message-ID: | CAKFQuwZd0-E9sp-HhyB7_RfOP8VpjE8s5VPVhWte5Xirb-UX_A@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Tuesday, April 22, 2025, Igor Korot <ikorot01(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Hi, ALL,
>
> On the page https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/runtime-config-
> query.html#GUC-SEQ-PAGE-COST
>
> it is only given the default value of this parameter.
>
> No min/max values are provided..
>
> The same can be sad about
> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/runtime-config-
> query.html#GUC-RANDOM-PAGE-COST
Costs can’t be negative and no reasonable positive value is going to exceed
the data type limit, which is communicated via the data type specification.
David J.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Banck | 2025-04-23 15:27:25 | Re: verify checksums online |
Previous Message | Zechman, Derek S | 2025-04-23 11:52:42 | segmentation fault |