From: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Bruce Momjian *EXTERN*" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
Cc: | Albe Laurenz <laurenz(dot)albe(at)wien(dot)gv(dot)at>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Prepared statements and generic plans |
Date: | 2016-06-06 15:57:41 |
Message-ID: | CAKFQuwZ_C3afvunBuaGuP41XsFExNgVPDxM8E_uwW39EP99LpQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 11:45 AM, Bruce Momjian *EXTERN* <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
wrote:
>
> One more thing --- there was talk of moving some of this into chapter
> 66, but as someone already mentioned, there are no subsections there
> because it is a dedicated topic:
>
> 66. How the Planner Uses Statistics.
> I am not inclined to add a prepare-only section to that chapter. On the
> other hand, the issues described apply to PREPARE and to protocol-level
> prepare, so having it in PREPARE also seems illogical. However, I am
> inclined to leave it in PREPARE until we are ready to move all of this
> to chapter 66.
>
>
Actually, 66.1 exists - Row Estimation Examples
We should create 66.2 - e.g. Statistics of Parameterized Plans
My point was 66. How the Planner Uses Statistics doesn't have a table of
contents. I suspect it will if we add 66.2. But, should it have one now,
when the only section is 66.1?
The wording improvement are good; but my recommended split between the SQL
command section and 66.2 still applies.
David J.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2016-06-06 15:59:24 | Re: New design for FK-based join selectivity estimation |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2016-06-06 15:50:43 | Re: Changed SRF in targetlist handling |