| From: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "oleg(dot)rekin(at)gmail(dot)com" <oleg(dot)rekin(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Docs <pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Array functions, array_length behavior given an empty array |
| Date: | 2021-11-08 17:11:58 |
| Message-ID: | CAKFQuwZUFG_aWQj5NpGpuiKGF9=BCPCHwWMjcECc6zqx4cdWmA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs |
On Monday, November 8, 2021, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Hi
>
> po 8. 11. 2021 v 13:48 odesílatel PG Doc comments form <
> noreply(at)postgresql(dot)org> napsal:
>
>> The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
>>
>> I believe, such case deserves to be mentioned in the description and/or in
>> examples.
>>
>
> you can read related discussion https://pgsql-hackers.
> postgresql.narkive.com/lZJQ64dp/array-length-anyarray
>
> Use instead function cardinality
>
I believe the OP has a point that we could do better with the documentation
though. Especially now that we’ve performed the function table
reformatting.
David J.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2021-11-08 17:21:24 | Re: Array functions, array_length behavior given an empty array |
| Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2021-11-08 16:38:49 | Re: Array functions, array_length behavior given an empty array |