Re: Assorted small doc patches

Updated status of the set.

On Wed, Apr 20, 2022 at 5:59 PM David G. Johnston <
david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

>
> v0001-database-default-name (-bugs, with a related cleanup suggestion as
> well)
>
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CAKFQuwZvHH1HVSOu7EYjvshynk4pnDwC5RwkF%3DVfZJvmUskwrQ%40mail.gmail.com#0e6d799478d88aee93402bec35fa64a2
>
>
> v0002-doc-extension-dependent-routine-behavior (-general, reply to user
> confusion)
>
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAKFQuwb_QtY25feLeh%3D8uNdnyo1H%3DcN4R3vENsUwQzJP4-0xZg%40mail.gmail.com
>
>
> v0001-doc-savepoint-name-reuse (-docs, reply to user request for
> improvement)
>
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAKFQuwYzSb9OW5qTFgc0v9RWMN8bX83wpe8okQ7x6vtcmfA2KQ%40mail.gmail.com
>

Pending discussion of alternate presentation of transaction sequence; if
not favorable, I can just go with a simple factual fix of the mistake in
v0001 (see this thread).

>
> v0001-on-conflict-excluded-is-name-not-table (-docs, figured out while
> trying to improve the docs to reduce user confusion in this area)
>
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CAKFQuwYN20c0%2B7kKvm3PBgibu77BzxDvk9RvoXBb1%3Dj1mDODPw%40mail.gmail.com#ea79c88b55fdccecbd2c4fe549f321c9
>
>
> v0001-doc-make-row-estimation-example-match-prose (-docs, reply to user
> pointing of an inconsistency)
>
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAKFQuwax7V5R_rw%3DEOWmy%3DTBON6v3sveBx_WvwsENskCL5CLQQ%40mail.gmail.com
>

David J.