Re: Improving some plpgsql error messages

From: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Improving some plpgsql error messages
Date: 2021-08-20 16:16:33
Message-ID: CAKFQuwZOE9reYYC-_Q7BbeemOTO3+gpgcE6eX9P9aNppVZczfQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 8:50 AM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

> Thoughts? Should I back-patch this into v14 where 2f48ede08
> came in, or just do it in HEAD?
>

I'd say back-patch in the interest of preventing probably quite a few
emails from novices at plpgsql coding dealing with all the interplay
between queries and variables and returning syntaxes.

David J.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2021-08-20 16:16:58 Re: The Free Space Map: Problems and Opportunities
Previous Message Jesper Pedersen 2021-08-20 16:13:16 Re: Middleware Messages for FE/BE