Re: [Doc] Improve hostssl related descriptions and option presentation

From: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [Doc] Improve hostssl related descriptions and option presentation
Date: 2025-02-27 18:37:58
Message-ID: CAKFQuwZLetR_bdTN2V7at3bX8GJu0xswpKy=LC76W+VCoADy-Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 2:20 PM David G. Johnston <
david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> Thoughts anyone?
>
> On Thu, Feb 1, 2024 at 3:47 PM David G. Johnston <
> david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> Motivated by a recent complaint [1] I found the hostssl related material
>> in our docs quite verbose and even repetitive. Some of that is normal
>> since we have both an overview/walk-through section as well as a reference
>> section. But the overview in particular was self-repetitive. Here is a
>> first pass at some improvements. The commit message contains both the
>> intent of the patch and some thoughts/questions still being considered.
>>
>> David J.
>>
>> [1]
>> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/170672433664.663.11895343120533141715%40wrigleys.postgresql.org
>>
>
Withdrawn as this now has conflicts from recent changes and no one seems
interested in voicing an opinion on this for or against.

David J.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff Davis 2025-02-27 18:42:27 Should work_mem be stable for a prepared statement?
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2025-02-27 18:37:00 Re: Showing primitive index scan count in EXPLAIN ANALYZE (for skip scan and SAOP scans)