From: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Alexander Ostrow <aj(at)epcylon(dot)com> |
Cc: | "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: syntax sugar for conditional check |
Date: | 2016-04-01 16:57:31 |
Message-ID: | CAKFQuwZ30Pk0OCeW3qv7DttXfc1nnRCq+Roci=ckXHip20W_Ng@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 10:19 AM, Alexander Ostrow <aj(at)epcylon(dot)com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I thought it would be cool to have conditional check syntax, which gets
> converted to simple check constraint syntax.
>
> Here’s a gist:
>
> https://gist.github.com/aj0strow/5a07f2ddcad324c4dac2c4095c821999
>
> It’s just sugar, but i think it would make check constraints easier to
> read, and easier to write without backwards boolean logic.
>
For future reference please make every effort to make emails to the list
self-contained - which has the added benefit of avoid link expiration in
the future.
As to the recommendation at hand - I don't see significant value in
implementing non-SQL Standard syntax in this area.
David J.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2016-04-01 17:06:42 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Improve internationalization of messages involving type names |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2016-04-01 16:52:42 | Re: Performance improvement for joins where outer side is unique |