| From: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Isaac Morland <isaac(dot)morland(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Flexible permissions for REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW |
| Date: | 2018-03-29 01:56:24 |
| Message-ID: | CAKFQuwZ-xFkHXQ=EUO6gQMqKhi7tCG9uAOP3TvJpudPn2ZwkpA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 6:38 PM, Isaac Morland <isaac(dot)morland(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:
>
> One question I would have is: what proposals exist or have existed for
> additional privilege bits? How much pressure is there to use some of the
> remaining bits? I actually looked into the history of the permission bits
> and found that we can summarize and approximate the history as 10 years of
> expansion from 4 to 12, then nothing added in the last 10 years.
>
I made an argument for an "ANALYZE" grant a little while back, and it
kinda leads one to want one for VACUUM as well.
David J.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Haribabu Kommi | 2018-03-29 02:07:09 | Re: ALTER TABLE ADD COLUMN fast default |
| Previous Message | Isaac Morland | 2018-03-29 01:38:12 | Re: Flexible permissions for REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW |