| From: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Greg Rychlewski <greg(dot)rychlewski(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-novice <pgsql-novice(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: replication connection and multi-command queries |
| Date: | 2022-01-24 00:28:36 |
| Message-ID: | CAKFQuwZ-t-oMRwf+MZ5rtHyuJ6yhjJkiHWQ0jiOKHMt-oX-H8Q@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-novice |
On Sun, Jan 23, 2022 at 5:24 PM Greg Rychlewski <greg(dot)rychlewski(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:
> Thanks for your reply. To give more context: I am contributing to a
> Postgres driver used by a programming language. We are currently trying to
> understand what is legal/not legal to be sent through this connection.
>
> In the documentation it states that the simple query protocol is followed
> on these connections, which is why we assumed a multi-command statement
> would work. I just wanted to make sure we are not doing anything wrong and
> that it is disallowed by design. We can, for instance, send "SELECT 1;" and
> receive a result.
>
>>
>>
Please don't top-post. The convention on these lists is to inline post.
If you are interacting at the protocol layer you probably should be posting
to -hackers, not -novice.
David J.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David G. Johnston | 2022-01-24 00:37:03 | Re: replication connection and multi-command queries |
| Previous Message | Greg Rychlewski | 2022-01-24 00:24:34 | Re: replication connection and multi-command queries |