| From: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | David Zhang <david(dot)zhang(at)highgo(dot)ca> |
| Cc: | Pavel Luzanov <p(dot)luzanov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: psql: Add role's membership options to the \du+ command |
| Date: | 2023-02-10 22:27:14 |
| Message-ID: | CAKFQuwYt3ENZoYgY2RBh-U4id_=vntT9uJ83PvxPSsPQ0Cc_Jw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Feb 10, 2023 at 2:08 PM David Zhang <david(dot)zhang(at)highgo(dot)ca> wrote:
>
> I noticed the document psql-ref.sgml has been updated for both `du+` and
> `dg+`, but only `du` and `\du+` are covered in regression test. Is that
> because `dg+` is treated exactly the same as `du+` from testing point of
> view?
>
Yes.
>
> The reason I am asking this question is that I notice that `pg_monitor`
> also has the detailed information, so not sure if more test cases required.
>
Of course it does. Why does that bother you? And what does that have to
do with the previous paragraph?
David J.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bharath Rupireddy | 2023-02-10 23:25:30 | Re: when the startup process doesn't (logging startup delays) |
| Previous Message | Justin Pryzby | 2023-02-10 22:01:31 | Re: possible memory leak in VACUUM ANALYZE |