Re: Commitfest overflow

From: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(dot)riggs(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Commitfest overflow
Date: 2021-08-07 20:31:41
Message-ID: CAKFQuwYrp56ne1=e+xdvycoBw6yEaCFWUDoF_Vn+rx=q0NWdWg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Aug 3, 2021 at 8:53 AM Simon Riggs <simon(dot)riggs(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
wrote:

> There are 273 patches in the queue for the Sept Commitfest already, so
> it seems clear the queue is not being cleared down each CF as it was
> before. We've been trying hard, but it's overflowing.
>

I think one simple change here would be of some help. Every patch should
come on to the commitfest in "Proposed" Status. Someone besides the author
of the patch then needs to move it from "Proposed" to "Needs Review". That
person does not have to be a reviewer or committer and is not obligating
themselves to working on the patch (though likely they would provide
input). They are simply, in the language of Robert's Rules of Order,
seconding the motion.

Removal from the CF could be automatic after the 3rd CF, though the CF
managers involved should, before returning it as "No Interest at this
Time", skim the thread and ask whether any commenters on the thread would
like to see it kept alive in the commitfest by seconding it. If so
removed, the author should be encouraged to re-submit during the next
version's development cycle.

David J.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David G. Johnston 2021-08-07 20:36:41 Re: Refactor ECPGconnect and allow IPv6 connection
Previous Message Michael Meskes 2021-08-07 19:43:15 Re: ECPG bug fix: DECALRE STATEMENT and DEALLOCATE, DESCRIBE