Re: cast to domain with default collation issue.

From: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: cast to domain with default collation issue.
Date: 2022-05-25 06:38:24
Message-ID: CAKFQuwYm-WdGnZeXWRCf0THZvd63EyguTOYSK5aNfP_AuMdEuQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Please don’t top-post.

On Tuesday, May 24, 2022, jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

>
> Otherwise, all input expressions must have the same implicit collation
>> derivation or the default collation. If any non-default collation is
>> present, that is the result of the collation combination. Otherwise, the
>> result is the default collation.
>>
>
> I think the above quote part can be used to explain the following
> examples.
>
>> CREATE TABLE test1 ( a text COLLATE "de_DE", b text COLLATE "es_ES", c
>> text );
>> SELECT a < 'foo' FROM test1;
>
> SELECT c < 'foo' FROM test1;
>
> But the *non-default* seems not that correct for me. Like a column if it does not mention anything, then the default value is null. So
> * create table test111( a tex*t) The default collation for column a is the same as the output of *show lc_collate*.
>
> so there is no *non-default? *
>
>
I’m not following the point you are trying to make. table111.a contributes
the default collation for any expression needing a collation implicitly
resolved.

David J.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message operations i 2022-05-25 06:42:30 Re: How is this possible "publication does not exist"
Previous Message jian he 2022-05-25 05:58:28 Re: cast to domain with default collation issue.