Re: Clarify VACUUM FULL exclusion in total_vacuum_time docs

From: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Clarify VACUUM FULL exclusion in total_vacuum_time docs
Date: 2025-06-06 13:57:11
Message-ID: CAKFQuwYgErraNuAUme-6dSwmwNSSStC8SL7560Qy2sAtUG5J+Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

On Friday, June 6, 2025, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Since last_vacuum and vacuum_count in pg_stat_all_tables explicitly mention
> that they don't include VACUUM FULL ("not counting VACUUM FULL"), I think
> we should add the same clarification to the description of
> total_vacuum_time.
> This field also excludes VACUUM FULL, and without this note, users might
> mistakenly think the time spent on VACUUM FULL is included. Thought?
>
> <structfield>total_vacuum_time</structfield> <type>double
> precision</type>
> </para>
> <para>
> - Total time this table has been manually vacuumed, in milliseconds.
> + Total time this table has been manually vacuumed, in milliseconds
> + (not counting <command>VACUUM FULL</command>).
> (This includes the time spent sleeping due to cost-based delays.)
> </para></entry>
> </row>
>

Makes sense. Our naming this table rewrite vacuum full does confuse
people into thinking it is related to vacuum.

David J.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Treat 2025-06-06 15:13:25 Re: Clarify VACUUM FULL exclusion in total_vacuum_time docs
Previous Message Fujii Masao 2025-06-06 11:38:35 Clarify VACUUM FULL exclusion in total_vacuum_time docs