Re: [CORE] Restore-reliability mode

From: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Claudio Freire <klaussfreire(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Geoff Winkless <pgsqladmin(at)geoff(dot)dj>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [CORE] Restore-reliability mode
Date: 2015-06-08 16:16:34
Message-ID: CAKFQuwYg5-kKVvibUK4gLeKyWn370FoPYJ7Z=Za=iu+a-9VXOw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 12:03 PM, Claudio Freire <klaussfreire(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:

> Just *when* is git ready for testing? You don't know from the outside.
>
> I do lurk here a lot and still am unsure quite often.
>
> Even simply releasing an alpha *tarball* would be useful enough. What
> is needed is the signal to test, rather than a fully-built package.
>
>
​IIUC the master branch is always ready for testing.

​I do not think the project cares whether everyone is testing the exact
same codebase; as long as test findings include the relevant commit hash
the results will be informative.

David J.​

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David G. Johnston 2015-06-08 16:32:45 Re: [CORE] Restore-reliability mode
Previous Message Geoff Winkless 2015-06-08 16:14:27 Re: [CORE] Restore-reliability mode