Re: Issue with custom operator in simple case

From: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Maxim Orlov <orlovmg(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Issue with custom operator in simple case
Date: 2025-06-30 16:52:07
Message-ID: CAKFQuwYdc8xdgJSrO4HyJjESDfZ9+E=DEKHuSEC43a+z07FkNQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Jun 30, 2025 at 8:49 AM Maxim Orlov <orlovmg(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> 3) CVE-2018-1058 revert.
> Rejected due to obvious reasons.
>
>
Not revert but maybe try again at convincing people that DBAs should be
given agency here by opting out of a security system that breaks
functioning code without providing, in reality, any immediate security
benefit.

David J.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Álvaro Herrera 2025-06-30 16:56:23 Re: ALTER TABLE ALTER CONSTRAINT misleading error message
Previous Message Álvaro Herrera 2025-06-30 16:37:53 Re: A concurrent VACUUM FULL?