From: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
Cc: | Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Lætitia Avrot <laetitia(dot)avrot(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ryan Lambert <ryan(at)rustprooflabs(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, ahsan hadi <ahsan(dot)hadi(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pg_dump new feature: exporting functions only. Bad or good idea ? |
Date: | 2022-03-25 00:25:45 |
Message-ID: | CAKFQuwYabFqVNv7DFX1TO+yXkOH4HCY7H-i-0uUuSHoKARSHsw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 10:49 PM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
wrote:
> What about patterns? Switches like --table or
> --extension are able to digest a psql-like pattern to decide which
> objects to dump.
>
The extension object type does not seem to have gotten the
--exclude-extension capability that it would need to conform to the general
design exemplified by --table and hopefully extended out to the routine
object types.
David J.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com | 2022-03-25 00:30:30 | RE: logical replication empty transactions |
Previous Message | David G. Johnston | 2022-03-25 00:16:47 | Re: Re: pg_dump new feature: exporting functions only. Bad or good idea ? |