| From: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "kengruven(at)gmail(dot)com" <kengruven(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Anonymous record member access |
| Date: | 2026-09-15 12:29:28 |
| Message-ID: | CAKFQuwYXTCWcLMDPXQYTuZPJ+oW89kTT=ikyi-PSya+nRqW_0w@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs |
On Monday, September 14, 2026, PG Doc comments form <noreply(at)postgresql(dot)org>
wrote:
> The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
>
> Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/18/sql-expressions.html
> Description:
>
> To summarize, things I don't understand from the docs:
> - where exactly the .f1 notation is documented
It probably isn’t documented behavior and thus should not be relied upon.
> - where/why it's not allowed to be used
> - how/why a ROW changes behavior when returned from a FUNCTION
I suspect these are just boundary issues that would be considered bugs if
this entire thing were considered documented behavior.
David J.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2026-09-15 14:19:30 | Re: Anonymous record member access |
| Previous Message | David G. Johnston | 2026-09-14 21:59:35 | Re: Constraint check is missing value check ARRAY |