Re: Key management with tests

From: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Masahiko Sawada <masahiko(dot)sawada(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Key management with tests
Date: 2021-01-15 22:07:01
Message-ID: CAKFQuwYW6--JMrGXE-yoHmN3OaCecYWyvFimwS3YwucxdaCMfg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 2:59 PM Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 4:47 PM Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> > If people want changes, I need to hear about it here. I have address
> > everything people have mentioned in these threads so far.
>
> That does not match my perception of the situation.
>
>
Looking at the Commitfest there are three authors and no reviewers. Given
the previous incident at minimum each of the people in the Commitfest
should add their approval to commit this patch to this thread. And while
committers get some leeway, in this case having a non-author review and
sign-off on it being ready-to-commit seems like it should be required.

David J.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2021-01-15 22:07:04 Re: Key management with tests
Previous Message Tomas Vondra 2021-01-15 22:05:02 Re: Change default of checkpoint_completion_target