Re: [DOCS] Stats views and functions not in order?

From: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [DOCS] Stats views and functions not in order?
Date: 2022-12-07 02:57:30
Message-ID: CAKFQuwYUCsugVg5cOgezh52W_2MwqMewXkr79DnxUVJ3Cs2dvA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Dec 6, 2022 at 6:36 PM Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> I'd like to "fix" this but IIUC there is no consensus yet about what
> order is best for patch 0001, right?
>
>
I'm planning on performing a more thorough review of 0003 and 0004 tomorrow.

As for 0001 - go with Peter E.'s suggested ordering.

David J.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com 2022-12-07 02:58:19 RE: Perform streaming logical transactions by background workers and parallel apply
Previous Message vignesh C 2022-12-07 02:55:25 Re: Commit fest 2022-11