Re: power() function in Windows: "value out of range: underflow"

From: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Huong Dangminh <huo-dangminh(at)ys(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Akio Iwaasa <aki-iwaasa(at)vt(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>
Subject: Re: power() function in Windows: "value out of range: underflow"
Date: 2018-05-01 19:44:22
Message-ID: CAKFQuwYMeUvMU3D3WMkCyiyy3sX942svfEoc-3Sgc44gO0fr8A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers

On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 12:08 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

>
> > But I don't think
> > we should discount the existence of the former category. Deploying
> > to production on an older release of $system than you develop on
> > is hardly an unusual scenario.
>
> That's probably true, but making dev, test, and production boxes
> similar is generally good practice and users can do as much or as
> little of it as they find they need in order to avoid getting burned.
> They can't do anything about behavior changes we inject into minor
> releases.

​+1; this doesn't seem clear-cut and important enough to deviate from the
(for me) preferable position of leaving well-enough-alone in the back
branches.

David J.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message PG Bug reporting form 2018-05-01 19:47:43 BUG #15183: pg_upgrade and pg_upgrade.exe both corrupt sequences when migrating 9.1 10.3
Previous Message David G. Johnston 2018-05-01 19:24:27 Re: BUG #15180: Alter table add column if not exists with unique constraint will add extra duplicate

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2018-05-01 20:16:02 Re: Parallel Aggregates for string_agg and array_agg
Previous Message Robert Haas 2018-05-01 19:43:43 Re: Global snapshots