Re: Docs: Distinguish table and index storage parameters in CREATE TABLE

On Fri, Apr 3, 2026 at 12:35 PM Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se> wrote:

> On 4/3/26 9:27 PM, Andreas Karlsson wrote:
> > On 4/3/26 8:18 PM, David G. Johnston wrote:
> >> Per the discussion on -general [1] I propose that we stop using the
> >> generic label storage_parameter on the create table reference page and
> >> instead set up proper labels for table and index variants.
> >
> > Nice patch, I like these changes! But you forgot to mention that you
> > added the index storage parameters as in <indexterm>. Not sure if it is
> > worth sending a new version of the patch for but something probably
> > useful for the committer to knw.
>
> Shouldn't also update ALTER INDEX and LATER TABLE to match?
>
>
I gave it a thought and decided there was no ambiguity to resolve on those
pages.

I'm not opposed to it but figured I'd wait for a committer to show interest
and ask the scope to be expanded to a full docs review instead of just
addressing the immediate user-reported confusion. When I do expand the
scope on my own it seems to scare them off.

David J.