Known Bugs on Postgres 9.5

From: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Anudeep Gudipelli <Anudeep(dot)Gudipelli(at)alticeusa(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Known Bugs on Postgres 9.5
Date: 2018-05-05 23:49:17
Message-ID: CAKFQuwYEzfhfjfH4jfkBW2wbRvToEut1_YC9t9uBs8-wKZT=OA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Friday, May 4, 2018, Anudeep Gudipelli <Anudeep(dot)Gudipelli(at)alticeusa(dot)com>
wrote:

> I would like to know the known bugs for v9.5 and also v9.6, is there any
> place where I can check?
>
I think as a whole the project does a good job of fixing known bugs shortly
after they are reported.

There is no official bug tracker (i.e., maintained by committers), for
better and worse, though the commitfest application does occasionally track
some, though usually those are cutting edge.

If you want an opinion, opting for more than one release behind current on
fear grounds is an ultra-conservative position - you might as well minimize
the pain and go recent and keep it longer. At this point I'd be asking
myself whether 9.6 or 10 is the better choice. Though with a third-party
application that runs on top of it I'd probably limit myself to the highest
release they purport to support.

David J.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Laurenz Albe 2018-05-06 11:01:21 Re: what's the error meaning? on mast/slavery replication .
Previous Message Adrian Klaver 2018-05-05 22:42:03 Re: Known Bugs on Postgres 9.5