| From: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "bsislow(at)accertify(dot)com" <bsislow(at)accertify(dot)com>, "pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: BUG #19455: ALTER TABLE RENAME will rename a sequence |
| Date: | 2026-04-13 14:23:11 |
| Message-ID: | CAKFQuwYBYgpra9+tH3dYQT=MMotrebVjvu1Pj2c20a3OUEKBCQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
On Monday, April 13, 2026, PG Bug reporting form <noreply(at)postgresql(dot)org>
wrote:
> The following bug has been logged on the website:
>
> Bug reference: 19455
> Logged by: Bob Sislow
> Email address: bsislow(at)accertify(dot)com
> PostgreSQL version: 15.2
> Operating system: Red Hat Enterprise Linux release 8.7 (Ootpa)
> Description:
>
> Is this expected behavior? ALTER TABLE RENAME will rename a sequence.
It’s documented:
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/sql-altertable.html#SQL-ALTERTABLE-DESC-RENAME
Arguably it’s better to use alter sequence so the somewhat buried
documentation for this seems ok.
David J.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2026-04-13 17:24:04 | Re: BUG #19006: Assert(BufferIsPinned) in BufferGetBlockNumber() is triggered for forwarded buffer |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2026-04-13 14:22:02 | Re: BUG #19455: ALTER TABLE RENAME will rename a sequence |