| From: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Jeff Davis <jdavis(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "pgsql-committers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-committers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pgsql: Fix search_path to a safe value during maintenance operations. |
| Date: | 2023-06-13 20:22:01 |
| Message-ID: | CAKFQuwY3AxtE+FT8P3RWGyWz33jQZaShdpD1An7SR5BuvmKFYw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jun 13, 2023 at 12:54 PM Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> wrote:
> On Mon, 2023-06-12 at 18:31 -0700, David G. Johnston wrote:
> > On a related note, are we OK with someone using this privilege
> > setting their own default_statistics_target?
> >
> >
> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/runtime-config-query.html#GUC-DEFAULT-STATISTICS-TARGET
> >
> > My prior attempt to open up analyze had brought this up as a reason
> > to avoid having someone besides the table owner allowed to analyze
> > the table.
>
> Thank you for bringing it up. I don't see a major concern there, but
> please link to the prior discussion so I can see the objections.
>
>
This is the specific (first?) message I am recalling.
David J.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2023-06-13 20:23:24 | Re: pgsql: Fix search_path to a safe value during maintenance operations. |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2023-06-13 19:59:15 | pgsql: Correctly update hasSubLinks while mutating a rule action. |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2023-06-13 20:23:24 | Re: pgsql: Fix search_path to a safe value during maintenance operations. |
| Previous Message | Tristan Partin | 2023-06-13 20:13:17 | Re: Meson build updates |