Re: simple patch for discussion

From: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Greg Hennessy <greg(dot)hennessy(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: simple patch for discussion
Date: 2025-07-18 04:08:35
Message-ID: CAKFQuwY2Eg+nKuC6bHv07tLmziO4O6DWEna3d2cW92d2huXhiA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thursday, July 17, 2025, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

>
> I find it hard to imagine that there'd be many people
>
around that would benefit from a global
> "always_use_this_number_of_parallel_workers" GUC.
>

Just to clarify, the global value would be -1 usually. It would be another
crappy planner hint for important queries to be assigned saying “make this
query go fast even if it doesn’t play nice with others”.

David J.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David G. Johnston 2025-07-18 04:23:57 Re: simple patch for discussion
Previous Message David Rowley 2025-07-18 03:51:16 Re: simple patch for discussion