| From: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> | 
|---|---|
| To: | Elein <elein(at)varlena(dot)com> | 
| Cc: | GENERAL <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> | 
| Subject: | Re: enum bug | 
| Date: | 2016-03-11 23:45:56 | 
| Message-ID: | CAKFQuwY-8Lgbp08agWErzjOKF+2qhJ2n_y61b++OovLRNmJuGQ@mail.gmail.com | 
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email | 
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general | 
On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 4:19 PM, Elein <elein(at)varlena(dot)com> wrote:
> An unused (yet) enum type cannot display the enum ranges. An empty table
> containing that type cannot display enum ranges.
>
Yes, it can.
CREATE TYPE rainbow AS enum ('red','orange','yellow','blue','purple');
SELECT enum_range(null::rainbow);
enum_range
{red,orange,yellow,blue,purple}
I get the distinction between classes and objects.  But in many cases, like
this one, you need to obtain an instance of a class - a null is generally
sufficient - and pass that instance to a function.  The function can then
use "pg_typeof(instance_value)::oid" to derive the oid for the
corresponding class.  This is a common idiom in PostgreSQL.
The only improvement, besides the error handling point, that I see to be
had here is your understanding of how the system works.
David J.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Chris Ruprecht | 2016-03-12 01:42:20 | OS X 10.11.3, psql, bus error 10, 9.5.1 | 
| Previous Message | cchee-ob | 2016-03-11 23:33:10 | BDR not catching up |