Re: Document "59.2. Built-in Operator Classes" have a clerical error?

On Sun, Aug 2, 2020 at 8:17 PM osdba <mailtch(at)163(dot)com> wrote:

> hi all:
>
> In Document "Table 59-1. Built-in GiST Operator Classes":
>
> "range_ops any range type && &> &< >> << <@ -|- = @> @>"， exist double "
> @>"，
>
> Should be "<@ @>" ?
>
>
It helps to reference the current version of the page (or provide a url
link) as that section seems to have migrated to Chapter 64 - though it is
unchanged even on the main development branch.

The table itself is extremely difficult to read: it would be more easily
readable if the font was monospaced, but its not.

I'm reasonably confident that the equal sign is part of the second-to-last
operator while the lone @> is the final operator. Mostly I say this
because GiST doesn't do straight equality so a lone equal operator isn't
valid.

David J.